Comments on: Creating a BBCode Parser http://www.ultramegatech.com/blog/2009/04/creating-a-bbcode-parser/ Web development blog from UltraMega Tech. Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:09:15 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Karl Roos http://www.ultramegatech.com/blog/2009/04/creating-a-bbcode-parser/comment-page-1/#comment-428 Karl Roos Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:26:25 +0000 http://www.ultramegatech.com/blog/?p=315#comment-428 Great code! Thanks! Great code! Thanks!

]]> By: Steve http://www.ultramegatech.com/blog/2009/04/creating-a-bbcode-parser/comment-page-1/#comment-419 Steve Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:26:03 +0000 http://www.ultramegatech.com/blog/?p=315#comment-419 TinyMCE looks like a good choice for a rich text editor that comes with BBCode support. <a href="http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/</a> TinyMCE looks like a good choice for a rich text editor that comes with BBCode support.

http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/

]]> By: neo22s http://www.ultramegatech.com/blog/2009/04/creating-a-bbcode-parser/comment-page-1/#comment-418 neo22s Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:01:37 +0000 http://www.ultramegatech.com/blog/?p=315#comment-418 Do you recommend any BBCODE editor for the front end user? Do you recommend any BBCODE editor for the front end user?

]]> By: Steve http://www.ultramegatech.com/blog/2009/04/creating-a-bbcode-parser/comment-page-1/#comment-225 Steve Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:25:28 +0000 http://www.ultramegatech.com/blog/?p=315#comment-225 That's a good point. I'll edit the regex to allow only URLs. That’s a good point. I’ll edit the regex to allow only URLs.

]]> By: lec http://www.ultramegatech.com/blog/2009/04/creating-a-bbcode-parser/comment-page-1/#comment-220 lec Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:49:45 +0000 http://www.ultramegatech.com/blog/?p=315#comment-220 Though it's compact and cute, the url tag could be used for various exploits, the htmlentities() notwithstanding (using javascript: schemes, for example). Perhaps you ought to change the (.*?) to a regex that will match only proper urls. Though it’s compact and cute, the url tag could be used for various exploits, the htmlentities() notwithstanding (using javascript: schemes, for example).

Perhaps you ought to change the (.*?) to a regex that will match only proper urls.

]]>